The Test-Optional Beneficiaries

A recent piece in The Stanford Daily addresses test-optional admissions.

As loyal readers of our college admissions blog know all too well, we believe that test-optional admissions policies don’t mean all that much. All else being equal, a student with great test scores will always have an advantage over a student with no test scores. Never, however, did we suggest that some students without test scores would not be able to earn admission to elite universities. After all, while we have long suggested that many admissions officers at elite universities don’t exactly tell it like it is, to not admit some students without scores under their new test-optional admissions policies wouldn’t even sit well with them. It’s why we have argued that a significant percentage of admits who do not submit test scores to elite universities will be low-income students, first-generation college students, and/or underrepresented minorities — and deservedly so! These students so often don’t get to receive fancy test prep. They don’t get to take the SAT or ACT multiple times. And sometimes they’ve got more important things to deal with at home, like watching their siblings while their parents are working double shifts, so they just don’t have time to study the vocab cards for plethora and copious.

A recent piece in The Stanford Daily by Nascha Martinez entitled “Incoming frosh reflect on Stanford’s test-optional admissions policies” shines a spotlight on our argument that these groups are the ones who benefit from test-optional admissions policies, which we of course fully support. As Martinez writes, “Emily Macias ’25 applied to Stanford during a global pandemic and amid fast-changing testing requirements. Test-prep affordability and difficulty in finding testing centers made Stanford’s move to test-optional ‘a relief,’ as she could not take the test before her senior year due to COVID-19. ‘I am FLI [first generation and/or low income], so I could not afford any SAT prep courses,’ Macias wrote to The Daily. Stanford’s test-optional policy meant that Macias ‘no longer had to worry about long studying hours, testing stress or the possibility of not being able to find an unfilled testing site near me.’ Incoming frosh report that Stanford’s test-optional admissions policy reduced stress and allowed more time to focus on other aspects of college applications.”

We love that America’s elite colleges, like Stanford, are doing away with barriers that for too long have made it more difficult for low-income, first-generation, and/or underrepresented minority groups to earn admission. We just wish admissions officers would be more forthright about test-optional admissions because by suggesting that all students are at no disadvantage for not submitting test scores — which is patently false — it only adds confusion to an already stressful process. Why not just tell it like it is? Students who can’t afford fancy test prep, students who are too busy working to help their parents pay the bills, students whose parents never went to college…these constitute the vast majority of students who can still earn admission to elite universities without SAT and ACT scores. Why is it so hard to say? The truth will set these admissions officers free.

 
 

You are permitted to use www.ivycoach.com (including the content of the Blog) for your personal, non-commercial use only. You must not copy, download, print, or otherwise distribute the content on our site without the prior written consent of Ivy Coach, Inc.

Categories:

Tags: , , , ,

2 Comments

  • Lucy Hernandez says:

    A lot of wealthy whites do very poorly on standardized tests too- even after ‘test prep’. Many poor whites are poorer than lower class blacks and latinos but are they given the same benefit that Ms. Macias enjoyed? No. Saying your aptitude is entirely based on money is horse dung. For example, most of the Apollo 13 base crew -who came up with a genius solution to rescue an aborted mission- came from very modest means and attended average state schools and only received bachelors degrees. What is going on today is what is called ‘reverse discrimination’. When was the last time you heard of a poor white applicant from Appalachia getting into Harvard? I have not. They don’t want those kids. Colleges spout lies that all whites are rich and advantaged. Not true. For instance, Most Ivy League Blacks have Graduate school educated African parents who have good paying jobs. And the majority of Latinos are not from families who really want to attend school, hence their lower representation. Their low numbers in college are not because they lack basic funds, but because their culture (mostly Mexican And CENTRAL AMERICA) looks down upon education. They think people should work and not study. Studying is not macho -or for women – hence their anathema for it. The article cited is fiction. Sorry but when you are playing with the facts that is when you lose integrity. The facts are so loud, I Can’t hear what you’re saying.

  • James Cavallo says:

    Bobby: Hey I am dumb, can I just say I am disadvantaged on my Princeton application so I don’t have to take the SAT?

    Counselor: Yes, disadvantaged will work. Also, Bobby, say no test center was near you.

    Bobby: That won’t work since I live next to a test center.

    Counselor: Just lie- they won’t check and even if they do, they will understand your desperate situation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.