Washington and Lee Admission

Admission to Washington and Lee, Washington and Lee University

What would George Washington have to say about the practices of the Washington & Lee admissions office?

A couple of days ago, we wrote about an article that appeared in “The Washington Post” in which Washington and Lee University is called out by writer Nick Anderson for manipulating their admissions data by counting incomplete applications. In this way, the school would naturally have a lower selectivity figure. To help you further understand, if 5,000,000 students applied to Hofstra and they admitted 1,000 applicants, Hofstra would be more selective than Harvard. In college admissions, quantity counts for something and that’s why many highly selective schools recruit students who they have no intention whatsoever of ever admitting.

If you scroll down to the Comments section of our previous blog on Washington and Lee, you’ll notice a commenter who criticizes us for singling out Washington and Lee. We didn’t single them out. They got caught red-handed manipulating admissions data and were the subject of an article in one of America’s most respected newspapers. We even stated that Washington and Lee isn’t alone in manipulating data like this.

Anyhow, in a follow-up to the piece in “The Washington Post” entitled “On college admission rates, batting averages and the comparability of statistics,” Nick Anderson compares the college admissions process — and admission rates in particular — to baseball — and, more specifically, to batting averages. But the problem is that while we know how to calculate batting averages, there is more grey area when it comes to admission rates. 

As he so states, “There is no universally recognized rule for the definition of ‘applicant.’ There is a federal definition with built-in wiggle room, there is a very similar guideline for reporting to market analysts, there are interpretations — but no hard-and-fast rules. That means college-bound students cannot really know whether one school’s admission rate is comparable with another’s.” In other words, some schools count incomplete applications as applicants, while others don’t. Washington & Lee surely isn’t alone in counting incomplete applications.

Should there be a standard by which all colleges must follow in the future? Let us know your thoughts on the subject by posting below.

Categories: , ,

Tags: , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *