University Admissions Process

We’ve been reading a number of articles lately on the university admissions process in which people write that the process is largely “random.” Sometimes they use less of a teenage word and write “arbitrary” but either way you cut it, what they’re saying is  incorrect. There is little that is “random” about the university admissions process. Are there some elements of luck? Yes. But, overall, luck plays a very minor role in the whole process. There is indeed a science to the university admissions process and science is by no means random.

College Admissions Process, College Admissions Process, Ivy League Admissions Process

The university admissions process is absolutely not random. It is a science. Every last component of it.

SAT and ACT scores as well as grades are objective means by which to compare various students. Standardized test scores allow admissions officers to somewhat level the playing field as an “A” in one school might be a “B+” in another. Education, as we know, is not consistent at each and every high school across the United States and neither are the metrics by which students are evaluated.

But we all know that standardized test scores and grades aren’t the only factors in the admissions process. Special talents and activities, family background, the quality of letters of recommendation, the quality of a student’s college essays, and much more factor into admissions decisions. There is a “holistic review” in college admissions. And yet even though the word “holistic” may imply that it’s less scientific than if admissions officers simply compared scores and grades and admitted students based on these metrics, these non-numeric components are rarely subjective!

There is a science to a great college essay. There is a science to the kind of college essay that a college admissions officer will want to read just as there is a science to the kind of college essay that an admissions officer will dread reading. There is a science to a great teacher letter of recommendation. There is a science to avoiding the mistakes that so many students make on their applications. And there is a science to so many other components of the admissions process as well.

So let’s stop saying that the process is random. If it were random, why do 93% of our students gain admission to their first choice college year in and year out? Why do 100% of our students gain admission to one of their top three college choices year in and year out? Over the course of twenty years. Can the student with perfect scores and perfect grades get denied admission? Absolutely! But that student isn’t denied admission because of the perfect grades and scores. That student is denied admission because he/she failed the science of another component of the admissions process. And at Ivy Coach, we know all of the components.


You are permitted to use (including the content of the Blog) for your personal, non-commercial use only. You must not copy, download, print, or otherwise distribute the content on our site without the prior written consent of Ivy Coach, Inc.


Tags: , , , ,

1 Comment

  • Milan Moravec says:

    Public University of California denies admission to qualified instate applicants. In spite of eligibility University of California Berkeley Chancellor Birgeneau ($450.000 salary), Provost Breslauer ($306,000 salary) shed thousands of instate applicants. Qualified instate applicants to public Cal. are replaced by a $50,600 payment from born abroad affluent foreign and affluent out of state students. And, Birgeneau subsidizes affluent foreign and affluent out of state tuition in the guise of diversity while he doubles instate tuition/fees.

    UC Berkeley fall admit rate for Californians drops to record low 18%. Birgeneau/Breslauer accept affluent $50,600 foreign students and displace qualified instate Californians (When depreciation of tax funded assets are included (as they should be), out of state and foreign tuition is more than $100,000 and does NOT subsidize instate tuition). Going to Cal. is now more expensive than Harvard, Yale.

    A shocking picture of inept UC Berkeley senior management. With the recommendations of Cal. Chancellor Birgeneau ($450,000 salary), Provost George Breslauer ($306,000 salary) allowed campus police to use excessive force – rammed baton jabs – on students protesting Birgeneau‘s doubling of instate tuition. Resignation of Birgeneau is necessary, but not sufficient, fire Breslauer.

    Forcefully send a message that this simply isn’t acceptable; UC Board of Regents

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.