The Defeated Students for Fair Admissions

UNC soundly defeated SFFA in a recent court case (photo credit: Yeungb).

Earlier this week, we noted that the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill defeated the group known as Students for Fair Admissions in a case before a United States District Court in which the university was accused by SFFA of discriminating against white and Asian American applicants in its admissions process. It marked the third high-profile defeat for SFFA in recent court cases (not including losses in the appeals process) as the group previously sued both the University of Texas at Austin and Harvard University — to no avail. But despite their losses, which have got to be incredibly demoralizing, the group’s longtime leader, Edward Blum, has put a positive spin on failure.

As Mr. Blum is quoted in a piece by Nick Anderson in The Washington Post entitled “Legal victory for UNC on race-conscious admissions comes as Supreme Court weighs whether to take up the issue,” “‘It is not unusual for high-profile and difficult legal cases to be resolved at the Supreme Court rather than the lower courts,’ Blum said Tuesday. ‘Students for Fair Admissions anticipated likely losses at the district court in all of the challenges to college admissions.'” Oh please. Rewind a few years and there’s no way that Edward Blum and SFFA would have been happy with these three decisive defeats, especially the Harvard defeat some thought could very well have swung their way. These outcomes are not what the one-man band challenging Affirmative Action had in mind and, no, Mr. Blum, it is unusual for high-profile and difficult legal cases to be resolved at the Supreme Court. Most cases — even high profile, difficult cases — don’t make the Supreme Court’s docket. But nice try there! We do love that spin.

The fact is if this case does end up before the Supreme Court — and it has a while to go before it would get there — the decisively conservative majority could rule that the consideration of race in college admissions is unlawful. But this case is not yet on our nation’s highest court’s docket and until it is, well, Mr. Blum is behind the eight-ball.

 
 

You are permitted to use www.ivycoach.com (including the content of the Blog) for your personal, non-commercial use only. You must not copy, download, print, or otherwise distribute the content on our site without the prior written consent of Ivy Coach, Inc.

Categories:

Tags: , , , ,

3 Comments

  • Priscilla Griffith, Esq. says:

    The ‘Conservative’ Supreme Court is a misnomer. The media crucified Kavanaugh for being what they thought was a conservative judge. Surprise, he turned out to be a fake conservative- ditto with Gorsuch and Miss Manners, Amy Phony Barrett. None of these people are principled and none will vote to reverse affirmative action in college admissions. OK, maybe 1 will- but it will not be a majority vote to strike down.

  • Justin Touster says:

    Yeah, I agree with the counselor above. I think they just won’t hear the case- period. SCOTUS has been dodging every controversial case. I think they just want to keep a good thing going- easy life, great benefits, lots of perks and notoriety, minus Antifa showing up at their Cafe Milano lunch to harass them about being racists for striking down affirmative action in admissions.

  • De’andra Square says:

    A White male marketing VP at North Carolina hospital wins $10million ‘reverse discrimination’ payout after he was replaced by two women – one of whom is black – as part of diversity and inclusion program. Sorry Coach you are WRONG! Discrimination regardless of color is racist! And I am black!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *