There is an editorial in today’s “Boston Globe” that the return of Early Action to Harvard makes the admissions process more equitable: “The admissions advantage for athletes has been a source of contention at Harvard for decades. A situation in which athletes get an early word, but few other applicants do, was hard to square with the overall philosophy of promoting equity. It’s far better to bring back early action — and to make sure all potential applicants know about the option.”
While it is true, athletes who applied Regular Decision these past couple of years to Harvard were indeed receiving Likely Letters at the time when candidates for admission would have received their notices if Early Action remained in place, reinstating Early Action at Harvard will not end this particular advantage for athletes. Coveted athletes who choose not to apply Early Action to Harvard but instead to apply Regular Decision next year will likely still be receiving those Likely Letters in December.
And early programs do not promote equity in spite of what the deans of admission and university presidents may say. Are early programs great for universities? Yes! Are they great for students who want to get accepted early on in their senior year and not have to worry about their admission decisions for many more months? You bet. But students who are admitted early are historically less diverse than those who are admitted through Regular Decision.
Read our related blogs: Harvard and Princeton Early Programs, The Harvard and Princeton Admission Spin, What Goes Around Comes Around, Will Colleges be Dropping Early Admissions Policies?, Likely Letters, and Early Notification, Likely Letters, Merit Money, Long Waitlists: All This for The Most Competitive Class in History?
You are permitted to use www.ivycoach.com (including the content of the Blog) for your personal, non-commercial use only. You must not copy, download, print, or otherwise distribute the content on our site without the prior written consent of The Ivy Coach, Inc.